Publications & Insights

Some institutional problems cannot be solved until they are seen differently.

The writing and research of Dr. Nadine Richards examine the judgments beneath consequential institutional decisions—what leaders notice, what they miss, what they give weight, and what happens after a decision is made.

The Institutional Judgment Review™

An inquiry into how institutions think, decide, and act.

The Institutional Judgment Review™ is an executive publication examining the conditions that shape consequential decisions across governance, strategy, leadership, and execution.

Each issue begins with a question facing institutions and looks beneath the immediate problem to examine the assumptions, relationships, structures, and judgments influencing what happens next.

Residue Essay — What Are We Missing? by Dr. Nadine Richards, July 2026

Residue Essay · Pre-release

What Are We Missing?

Read the Essay →
Institutional Judgment Review™ Volume 1, Issue 1 — The Quiet Crisis Facing Institutions

Volume 1 · Issue 1

The Quiet Crisis Facing Institutions

Read the Issue →
Institutional Judgment Review™ Volume 1, Issue 2 — The Executive–Board Partnership

Volume 1 · Issue 2

The Executive–Board Partnership

Read the Issue →

"Institutions don't perform at the level of their intentions. They perform at the level of their judgment."

— Dr. Nadine Richards

Scholarship

The ideas are informed by practice—and tested through inquiry.

Dr. Richards' writing sits at the intersection of executive practice, scholarship, and institutional observation. Her research examines leadership, institutions, decision-making, and the conditions that influence who is heard, what is given weight, and whether organizations are able to act on what they know.

Roses from Concrete® — published work by Dr. Nadine Richards

Roses from Concrete®

A study of Black women in educational leadership examining how institutional conditions shape entry, authority, persistence, and the exercise of leadership.

Get the Book on Amazon

The Throughline

Different forms. One continuing question.

Across research, writing, advisory work, and speaking, the inquiry remains consistent: What enables capable leaders and institutions to exercise sound judgment when the answer is not obvious?

Institutional Judgment™ examines not only how decisions are made, but what deserves weight, what the moment requires, and how judgment travels through action, execution, consequences, and what institutions learn from what follows.

Some ideas are written. Others are meant to be encountered in the room.

Explore Speaking & Keynotes

What is your institution not yet seeing?

The most consequential questions rarely begin with an obvious answer. Sometimes they begin by examining what has been given weight, what has been overlooked, and what the moment now requires.

Request an Executive Strategy Conversation